By genre
Casual indie games
Independent Casual games, ranked by real player poke activity — not by who paid the most.
- listed here
- 31
why #1
How this score was built
(32.5 + 2.0 + 2.8 + 6.2) × age decay 0.94 × integrity 1.00 = 50.21
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 11 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #2
How this score was built
(36.0 + 2.0 + 3.6 + 7.4) × age decay 0.73 × integrity 1.00 = 42.84
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 49 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
- 24h
- 3
- 30d
- 4
- people
- 1
why #3
How this score was built
(18.0 + 2.0 + 1.4 + 7.2) × age decay 0.97 × integrity 1.00 = 37.41
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 4 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
- 24h
- 0
- 30d
- 7
- people
- 3
why #8
How this score was built
(10.5 + 2.8 + 5.3) × age decay 0.95 × integrity 1.00 = 17.69
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 7 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #12
How this score was built
(8.5 + 1.4 + 6.4) × age decay 0.96 × integrity 1.00 = 15.66
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 3 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
- 24h
- 1
- 30d
- 7
- people
- 3
why #14
How this score was built
(7.0 + 1.0 + 2.8 + 5.3) × age decay 0.70 × integrity 1.00 = 14.75
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 7 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #15
How this score was built
(6.0 + 2.8 + 5.7) × age decay 0.96 × integrity 1.00 = 13.84
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 4 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #25
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 4.1) × age decay 0.97 × integrity 1.00 = 6.80
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #26
How this score was built
(3.0 + 2.8 + 4.1) × age decay 0.68 × integrity 1.00 = 6.71
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 23 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #27
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 4.1) × age decay 0.96 × integrity 1.00 = 6.68
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
- 24h
- 0
- 30d
- 1
- people
- 1
why #31
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.6) × age decay 0.98 × integrity 1.00 = 6.39
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
- 24h
- 0
- 30d
- 1
- people
- 1
why #33
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.6) × age decay 0.95 × integrity 1.00 = 6.20
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #34
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.4) × age decay 0.98 × integrity 1.00 = 6.16
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #36
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.5) × age decay 0.96 × integrity 1.00 = 6.12
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #37
How this score was built
(1.5 + 2.2 + 3.4) × age decay 0.86 × integrity 1.00 = 6.08
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 5 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #41
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.4) × age decay 0.88 × integrity 1.00 = 5.55
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 2 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #42
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.4) × age decay 0.88 × integrity 1.00 = 5.53
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 2 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #43
How this score was built
(1.5 + 2.2 + 3.8) × age decay 0.61 × integrity 1.00 = 4.60
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 9 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #44
How this score was built
(1.5 + 2.2 + 3.8) × age decay 0.61 × integrity 1.00 = 4.56
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 4 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #45
How this score was built
(1.5 + 1.4 + 3.6) × age decay 0.66 × integrity 1.00 = 4.32
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 4 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #46
How this score was built
(1.4 + 2.5) × age decay 0.87 × integrity 1.00 = 3.36
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #50
How this score was built
(1.4 + 2.1) × age decay 0.88 × integrity 1.00 = 3.05
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 1 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #51
How this score was built
(2.8 + 2.2) × age decay 0.61 × integrity 1.00 = 3.03
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 4 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method
why #53
How this score was built
(2.2 + 1.9) × age decay 0.70 × integrity 1.00 = 2.89
- Poke integrity
- 0 of 3 flagged as risky
- Where pokes came from
- website 100%
- Last recalculated
- 19 minutes ago
Every listing is scored by the same formula, on public numbers. Read the method